Donalds & Company,CPAs,audited the financial statements included in the annual report submitted by Markum Securities,Inc.,to the Securities and Exchange Commission.The audit was improper in several respects.Markum is now insolvent and unable to satisfy the claims of its customers.Customers have instituted legal action against Donalds based on Section 10(b) and Rule 10(b) -5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Which of the following is likely to be Donalds' best defense?
A) The firm did not intentionally certify the false financial statements.
B) Section 10(b) does not apply to the case.
C) The firm was not in privity of contract with the creditors.
D) The engagement letter specifically disclaimed any liability to any party that resulted from Markum's fraudulent conduct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q94: A public entity subject to the periodic
Q95: If a CPA firm is being sued
Q96: Which of the following third parties is
Q97: Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,entities
Q98: Which of the following statements regarding auditors'
Q100: West & Co.,CPAs,rendered an unqualified opinion on
Q101: The Securities and Exchange Commission document that
Q102: Plaintiffs bringing action under common law need
Q103: Under generally accepted auditing standards,auditors are responsible
Q104: In a(n)_,a small number of plaintiffs with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents