In Diaz V Pan Am Word Airways Inc

In Diaz v. Pan Am Word Airways Inc., the plaintiff was denied a job as a flight attendant because the airline had a policy of hiring only women as flight attendants. The court held that:

A) because the airline proved women were better in certain aspects of the job, gender was a bona fide qualification for the position.
B) because customer and employee preference was so high, gender was a bona fide qualification for the position.
C) while important, more effective performance by women in nonmechanical functions and customer preference did not make gender a bona fide qualification for the position.
D) hiring men as flight attendants would lead to sexual harassment.