If a party has been delivered nonconforming goods and has rejected them and is then forced to cover in order to maintain business operations,the party may sue the seller for the difference in price plus consequential damages.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is true according to the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code). If a buyer has rejected nonconforming goods and is forced to cover to continue their business operations, they can sue the seller for the difference in price between the original contract price and the cost of cover, as well as any consequential damages resulting from the seller's breach of contract.

If a Party Has Been Delivered Nonconforming Goods and Has