In Sons of Thunder Inc

In Sons of Thunder Inc., v. Borden Inc., it was alleged that Borden breached its contract with the owners of Sons of Thunder by not purchasing the required amount of clams. The court found that:

A) because Borden urged the plaintiffs to purchase bigger boats to handle "shuck-at-sea" technology and then canceled the "shuck-at-sea" program, buying fewer clams from the plaintiff and then buying from a competitor, Borden had not acted in good faith.
B) Borden had breached an output contract by not buying all of the plaintiffs' clams and buying from competitors.
C) purchasing larger boats by the plaintiffs was a business decision that Borden could not be held responsible for.
D) Borden had breached a requirements contract by buying from competitors when the plaintiffs still had available clams to sell to Borden.