In Leonard V

In Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc., the court ruled against Leonard and refused to enforce the purchase of a Harrier jet because:

A) the advertisement specifically referred to the accumulation of points to purchase items in the catalog and the Harrier was not listed in the catalog.
B) the sale of a Harrier jet, still used by the military, would jeopardize national security, so Pepsi's ad could not be taken seriously.
C) Leonard did not accumulate points but instead purchased them, which violated the rules of the offer.
D) Leonard did not accept the offer in the manner specified and required in the offer, so his acceptance was defective and void.