In Cipollone V

In Cipollone v. Liggett Group Inc., et al., Cipollone sued based on state laws regulating advertising and promotional activities in the tobacco industry.

A) Cipollone won because the state laws were specific and were violated by the defendant.
B) Cipollone won because although there were federal laws regulating promotion and advertising activities regarding tobacco products, they specifically authorized supplemental state laws negating preemption.
C) Cipollone lost because the federal and state laws conflicted, negating both, so the court had no basis to make its decision.
D) Cipollone lost because he relied on state law, which was preempted by federal law.