Mere foolishness or want of knowledge constitutes the grounds for unconscionability of contracts.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The doctrine of unconscionability emerged from court decisions where jurists concluded that some contracts are so unfair or oppressive as to demand intervention.
Mere foolishness or want of knowledge does not constitute grounds for unconscionability,nor is a contract unconscionable and hence unenforceable merely because one party is spectacularly clever and the other is not.

Mere Foolishness or Want of Knowledge Constitutes the Grounds for Unconscionability