The difference between a mediator and an arbitrator is that:
A) a mediator is not a neutral party.
B) an arbitrator is chosen by the disputing parties, while a mediator is not.
C) an arbitrator can force a binding solution on both parties.
D) a mediator can impose a binding solution on the parties.
E) only an arbitrator may be appointed by a judge.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A mediator cannot impose a binding solution on the parties. However, as an unbiased and disinterested third party, a mediator is often able to help the parties bring about an understanding of a dispute and thus avoid litigation of it.

The Difference Between a Mediator and an Arbitrator Is That