Lane worked as the public assistance coordinator for the county.Her supervisor,Herald,received information that Lane was engaged in food stamp fraud.She was fired after Herald searched her office and found evidence against her.Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this case?
A) Lane's rights have been violated because she was an at-will employee and the search was per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.
B) Lane has no recourse because Herald had reasonable grounds to suspect that the search would reveal she was engaged in food stamp fraud.
C) Lane has a legal recourse under the Privacy Act.
D) Lane has a legal claim for invasion of privacy.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Suzy is employed as a secretary for
Q11: Gerard is a high-level employee at the
Q12: Paul lives in New York.Paul's employer,Susan,supports the
Q13: No comprehensive federal workplace privacy legislation exists.
Q14: The Supreme Court,in Griswold v.Connecticut,held that restricting
Q16: The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Q17: Employment-at-will means that the employee serves at
Q18: Tanya openly talks to her co-workers about
Q19: Ling was fired by MTM Mart because
Q20: It is unlawful under the Electronic Communications
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents