In the Case of Price Waterhouse V

In the case of Price Waterhouse v.Hopkins,the U.S.Supreme Court determined that:

A) the employer had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by imposing sex-differentiated appearance and grooming standards on its male and female employees.
B) the claimant did not produce sufficient evidence to show that she was not given the same opportunities to advance as her male co-workers.
C) it is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for gender stereotyping to play a significant role in evaluating an employee's work performance.
D) it is not unlawful to have gender-based grooming policies because employers are free to determine how to run their businesses.