Nesbitt hires Francois,an alien working in the United States with the legal authority to do so.One month later,Francois loses his right to work in the United States.Which of the following holds true in this case?
A) Nesbitt's continued employment of Francois cannot constitute a violation of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) under any circumstance.
B) Nesbitt's continued employment of Francois will constitute national origin discrimination against individuals with American citizenship.
C) Nesbitt's continued employment of Francois will constitute a violation of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) if Nesbitt knows that Francois has become an unauthorized alien.
D) Nesbitt's continued employment of Francois is not unlawful because it is an unfair immigration-related practice for a person to discriminate against any individual based on their national origin.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Jingfei,an employee of Chinese origin,works as a
Q10: Criminal penalties can be imposed for violations
Q11: To successfully claim discrimination based on national
Q12: An employer may decide to not hire
Q13: An employer who enters into a contract
Q15: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)created a
Q16: The discharge of a teacher from her
Q17: Innocent or negligent discrimination is a defense
Q18: Citizenship and national origin are the same.
Q19: National origin was included in Title VII's
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents