At Nevu Systems Inc.'s office,Nathan's workstation is next to Karen's.One day,Nathan overhears Karen's supervisor,Paul,say to Karen that women should just stick to being homemakers.Karen,who was subjected to such comments at work earlier as well,files a complaint of gender discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).After the investigation and the EEOC's ruling in Karen's favor,Nathan is ill-treated at work simply for supporting Karen during the trial.Which of the following holds true in this scenario?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Nathan can prove a case of retaliation against Nevu Systems Inc. In order to prove a retaliatory discharge claim, an employee must show that there was an adverse employment action toward the employee by the employer. For instance, if an employee is given a right to serve jury duty but is terminated by the employer for doing so, with no other apparent reason for the termination, that employee has a basis for a retaliation claim.
Essay Questions