Federal courts have consistently upheld conviction in RICO cases when they are challenged on the basis of double jeopardy by finding that
A) multiple offenses are valid as long as one element of the crime is different for each of the offenses.
B) a state prosecution under RICO requires a subsequent federal prosecution of the same person for the same act.
C) people convicted under a state substantive offense often prefer to be tried under a federal organized crime offense,since they usually receive shorter sentences.
D) multiple offenses are valid as long as they are applied to organized criminals.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Critics of RICO claim that
A)under RICO,convicted persons
Q3: Bosses of organized crime families are NOT
Q4: One of the reasons many states have
Q5: The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986
Q6: _ traditionally involves extorting money from businesses
Q8: _ is NOT true about organized crime
Q9: The crime of _ is the practice
Q10: A typical characteristic of bookmaking does NOT
Q11: When a member of the organization uses
Q12: A continuing criminal enterprise requires that the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents