What did the United Supreme Court state in Mapp v.Ohio?
A) Any information derived from illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible.
B) Illegally derived evidence is admissible as long as excluding the evidence would not deter unlawful police conduct.
C) The exclusionary rule seeks to deter unlawful police conduct.
D) The case adopted the English and Canadian exclusionary rule.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: Which of the following is a search?
A)A
Q25: What United States Supreme Court decision established
Q26: What is the current formulation of the
Q27: Which United States Supreme Court case rejected
Q28: A police officer must always have probable
Q30: A person has no expectation of privacy
Q31: Which one of the following is not
Q32: Which of the following is false about
Q33: Police must always knock and announce their
Q34: An individual has a constitutional right against
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents