In Silverthorne Lumber Co.v.United States the United States Supreme Court held?
A) Not only is illegally obtained evidence inadmissible,but any evidence derived from that illegally obtained evidence is also inadmissible.
B) Illegally derived evidence is admissible as long as excluding the evidence would not deter unlawful police conduct.
C) The exclusionary rule sought to deter unlawful police conduct and the courts should not participate in the officer's illegality by allowing the fruits of the illegal conduct into court.
D) The case adopted the English and Canadian exclusionary rule.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q32: Which of the following is false about
Q33: Police must always knock and announce their
Q34: An individual has a constitutional right against
Q35: Which of the following is not true
Q36: Which case interpreted the inevitable-discovery exception?
A)Silverthorne Lumber
Q38: The exclusionary rule was developed for which
Q39: Which United States Supreme Court case formulated
Q40: Which United States Supreme Court case formulated
Q41: In which of the following instances is
Q42: Which of the following is not a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents