A confession of one defendant,implicating a co-defendant is generally inadmissible because of the mandates of the

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The confession of one defendant implicating a co-defendant is generally inadmissible because it violates the co-defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront their accuser. This is known as the "Bruton rule," established in the case of Bruton v. United States. The Fifth Amendment self-incrimination and due process clauses may also be relevant, but the primary issue is the Confrontation Clause.

A Confession of One Defendant,implicating a Co-Defendant Is Generally Inadmissible