Murphy V.Waterfront Commission Held That

Murphy v.Waterfront Commission held that

A) if a state grants immunity to a witness,the federal government is not bound by the state's immunity and may still compel the witness to testify in a federal prosecution.
B) if a state grants immunity to a witness,the federal government is bound by the state's immunity and may not compel the witness to testify in a federal prosecution.
C) if the federal government grants immunity to a witness,the state may still use the witness's testimony,as long as it is transactional testimony.
D) if the federal government grants immunity to a witness,the state may still use the witness's testimony,as long as the witness was granted conditional immunity.