Suppose Matt and Gabe must both choose between two jobs, a safe job that pays $250 per week and a risky job that pays $300 per week. The value of safety to each is $75 per week. Having more income than the other is worth $75 per week to each, and having less income than the other means a $75-per-week reduction in satisfaction. Having the same income as the other means no change in satisfaction. The payoff matrix below summarizes this situation. If we compare the payoffs when both choose the risky job to the payoffs when both choose the safe job, then we can see that:
A) each would be better off if they both picked the risky job.
B) each would be better off if they both picked the safe job.
C) it is socially optimal for both to pick the risky job.
D) both are equally off with either outcome.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q81: If the cost to firms of reducing
Q82: Suppose Matt and Gabe must both choose
Q84: The greater the degree of labor market
Q85: Which argument in favor of enacting workplace
Q86: If firms are providing the optimal level
Q87: Suppose that all workers value a safe
Q88: Suppose that all workers value a safe
Q172: The major difficulty with using a tax
Q177: Compared to a fixed percentage reduction regulation,
Q184: Suppose you are an economic researcher, and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents