Why was the "comply or explain" approach to corporate governance problematic?
A) It was too strict and fined corporations that did not conform to its standards heavily.
B) It did not permit corporations to express why they chose not to comply with certain rules.
C) Its definition of what constitutes an acceptable explanation for not complying was vague.
D) It expected corporations to abide by an extremely rigid set of operating standards.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: By merging the roles of the chief
Q37: Permitting one individual to function as both
Q38: The Cadbury report argued for a guideline
Q39: Ethical misconduct is possible even if the
Q40: The argument in favor of merging the
Q42: One of the responsibilities of the audit
Q44: The Cadbury report addressed:
A) the cultural aspects
Q45: One of the primary responsibilities of an
Q45: The board of directors of a company:
A)
Q46: Poor corporate governance:
A) weakens a company's potential
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents