Suppose a treacherous stretch of road winds through Deadman's Canyon for 5 miles.A highway department study estimates that better lighting would reduce the traffic fatality rates as follows: $$\begin{array} { c c c }
\text { Number of lights } & \text { Estimated deaths per year } & \text { Total installation cost (in millions) } \
0 & 3 & \$ 0 \mathrm {~m} \
1 & 2 & \$ 3 \mathrm {~m} \
2 & 1.5 & \$ 7 \mathrm {~m} \
3 & 1.2 & \$ 12 \mathrm {~m} \
4 & 1 & \$ 18 \mathrm {~m} \
5 & 0.9 & \$ 25 \mathrm {~m}
\end{array}$$
Applying economic analysis to determine expenditures on safety improvements that save lives

Question

Suppose a treacherous stretch of road winds through Deadman's Canyon for 5 miles.A highway department study estimates that better lighting would reduce the traffic fatality rates as follows: $$\begin{array} { c c c } 
\text { Number of lights } & \text { Estimated deaths per year } & \text { Total installation cost (in millions) } \
0 & 3 & \$ 0 \mathrm {~m} \
1 & 2 & \$ 3 \mathrm {~m} \
2 & 1.5 & \$ 7 \mathrm {~m} \
3 & 1.2 & \$ 12 \mathrm {~m} \
4 & 1 & \$ 18 \mathrm {~m} \
5 & 0.9 & \$ 25 \mathrm {~m}
\end{array}$$
Applying economic analysis to determine expenditures on safety improvements that save lives

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Applying economic analysis to determine expenditures on safety improvements that save lives ensures that the most lives are saved at the lowest opportunity cost. While it may not be possible to place a dollar value on human life, economic analysis can weigh the costs and benefits of safety improvements and prioritize those that save the most lives for the least amount of money. This approach allows for more efficient allocation of resources towards safety improvements without necessarily reallocating all resources away from other areas. The options listed in the question do not accurately reflect the potential benefits of economic analysis in safety improvement decision-making.

Suppose a Treacherous Stretch of Road Winds Through Deadman's Canyon