Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of its waste "for free" by dumping it into a nearby river.While the firm benefits from dumping waste into the river,the waste reduces the fish and bird reproduction.This causes damage to local fishermen and bird watchers.At a cost,Erie Textiles can filter out the toxins,in which case local fishermen and bird watchers will not suffer any damage.The relevant gains (in thousands of dollars) and losses for the three parties are listed below.
Refer to the information given above.Suppose you observe that Erie has not added a filter.You could conclude that the Coase Theorem failed to solve the externality problem because:
A) Erie's benefits to operating without a filter are greater than the benefits of a filter to the fishermen and bird watchers.
B) negotiation with many individual fishermen and bird watchers was too costly.
C) Erie has a property right to the river.
D) regulators prevent application of the Coase Theorem when the environment is at stake.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: If the marginal cost of reducing pollution
Q54: Suppose that the EPA has proposed strict
Q55: Curly and Moe are considering living alone
Q56: Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of
Q58: Suppose that the EPA has proposed strict
Q60: Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of
Q61: The tragedy of the commons refers to
Q62: A policy maker has argued for higher
Q62: This graph shows the marginal costs and
Q80: From the perspective of an externality, most
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents