In the Microsoft antitrust case, the federal government said in essence that
A) the mere presence of monopoly violated the Sherman Act, irrespective of Microsoft's behavior.
B) Microsoft was a "bad monopoly."
C) Microsoft was generally a "good monopoly" but that its tying contracts involving Internet Explorer violated the Clayton Act.
D) the case was similar to the U.S. Steel case of 1920.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The federal government argued that Microsoft engaged in anti-competitive practices to maintain its monopoly, particularly through its actions related to Internet Explorer, which made it a "bad monopoly."

In the Microsoft Antitrust Case, the Federal Government Said in Essence