Two Bacterial Genes Are Transduced Simultaneously

Two bacterial genes are transduced simultaneously. What does this suggest about their proximity to each other within the original host genome?

A) Not a thing-it's highly likely that 2 separate virus particles were carrying each gene, and that they coinfected the new target cell at the same time, delivering their genetic payloads. This could mean the 2 original genes might not even be from the same original host cell!
B) It's highly likely that the 2 genes are located next to each other in the original host cell chromosome. Since transduction relies on either mispackaging of bits of host cell DNA into non-functional virus units, or improper excision of lysogenic phage DNA from a host cell chromosome (carrying parts of the host cell DNA with it) , the genes must lie close to each other to be transduced into a new cell simultaneously.
C) They must be within 5 gene lengths of each other, but not necessarily immediately adjacent. If they were immediately adjacent, the transposons that facilitate the transfer of genetic information between the 2 cells wouldn't be able to 'jump' into them.
D) It doesn't mean anything. Transduction relies on the ability of a cell to take up foreign DNA. It's possible here that the cell has simply taken up 2 separate bits of DNA at the same time from the surrounding environment.