In the case of Williams et al.v.Pryor,the court ruled unconstitutional the Alabama law that prohibited distribution of "any device...for the stimulation of human genitals." The plaintiffs had shown that the use of such devices for the stimulation of human genitals was protected under the right of

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court ruled that the Alabama law prohibiting distribution of devices for the stimulation of human genitals violated the right of sexual privacy, which is protected under the Constitution. The use of such devices is considered a private sexual activity and individuals have a right to engage in it without interference from the government.

In the Case of Williams Et Al