A car collector, Mr.F.Hansen, who said his 1975 Chevrolet Corvette was certified as the last Corvette convertible to be produced, sued General Motors to stop it from manufacturing any more of the convertible sports cars.The suit also requested $1.5 million in damages.Hansen claimed he bought the car for its collector's value.It came with a letter from GM dated August 25, 1975, that said the car was "the last Corvette convertible that General Motors Corp.would ever manufacture." Hansen said the value of his car has been decreasing ever since GM resumed manufacturing Corvette convertibles in 1985.If the court ruled in favor of Mr.Hansen, what general type of regulation would such a ruling represent?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The ruling in favor of Mr. Hansen would represent regulation aimed at protecting consumers from unfair trade practices, specifically false advertising or misleading information regarding the production of a product. The letter from GM that accompanied Mr. Hansen's car provided him with the belief that he owned the last Corvette convertible, and his claim suggests that GM's decision to resume production decreased the value of his vehicle. In this case, Mr. Hansen is seeking damages for the decrease in value caused by GM's false advertising.

A Car Collector, Mr