In Texaco Inc.v.Dagher et al.two oil refiners and gas suppliers,Texaco and Shell Oil,entered into a joint venture called Equilon to consolidate their operations in the western U.S.Historically,Texaco and Shell were competitors but for their joint venture they shared expenses and profits equally.The products produced by Equilon were sold under the brand names Texaco and Shell at a mutually agree upon price.Texaco and Shell retailers brought a class action lawsuit against the two companies claiming there was a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act because of the lack of price competition.The court held that:
A) there was a per se violation because the joint venture was plainly anticompetitive.
B) there was a per se violation because oil companies are automatically held to this standard.
C) the rule of reason standard should apply because a market analysis was relevant.
D) the rule of reason standard should apply because it is a joint venture and not a meeting of the minds
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Vertical restraints are agreements between:
A) business and
Q45: Horizontal restraints are agreements between:
A) business and
Q49: Joe and Arthur each own a chain
Q52: Which of these is not one of
Q55: Modern antitrust law's focus is on:
A) protecting
Q56: The U.S.Supreme Court held that the Sherman
Q58: When is a monopoly illegal under the
Q59: Which act does the Robinson-Patman Act amend?
A)
Q61: In U.S.v.Microsoft the appellate court found that:
A)
Q80: What constitutes a meeting of the minds
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents