If there is no direct evidence of an agreement to manipulate the competitive market between two CEOs a prosecutor may use their calendars and subsequent actions that were not in the usual course of business as circumstantial evidence to prove what requirement of an antitrust violation?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Circumstantial evidence like unusual actions and calendar entries can be used to demonstrate a "meeting of the minds," which is necessary to prove an agreement or conspiracy in antitrust violations.

If There Is No Direct Evidence of an Agreement to Manipulate