In Goodrich Corp.v.Town of Middlebury there were two public landfills that were designated as Superfund sites.The principally responsible parties formed a coalition to sue several municipalities for assistance in cleanup costs.During the litigation,a special master was appointed to determine which parties contributed how much waste.When the case went to trial,the district court chose not to follow the determinations of the special master and determined themselves the liability of the municipalities.The decision was appealed.The appellate court determined that disregarding the special master's determination of liability was:
A) permissible for the district court because it was within its rights to determine the municipalities more liable than the special master determined.
B) not permissible because the district court was legally bound by the Superfund to accept the liability findings of the special master.
C) permissible because the special master should not have been appointed.
D) not permissible because there was no error of law in the determination of liability
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: The Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA)does which
Q46: Which of these is not regulated through
Q48: Which of these is not a way
Q48: The Superfund law addresses hazardous substance cleanup
Q48: What legislation amended the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Q50: Which of these is not one of
Q51: Which of these is not a class
Q54: What is one of the main criticisms
Q56: The Environmental Defense Fund, an environmental watchdog
Q60: Who sets the water quality standards for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents