Which of the following will be a valid defense in a strict products liability case?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In strict products liability cases, the defendant can use the defense of assumption of risk if the plaintiff was aware of the product's potential harm and still chose to use it. This defense suggests that the plaintiff was responsible for any injuries they suffered because they knowingly assumed the risk. Comparative negligence and contributory negligence are not valid defenses in strict products liability cases because the plaintiff's actions and behavior prior to the injury are irrelevant. Consent is also not a valid defense in strict products liability cases because the plaintiff did not willingly and knowingly agree to be injured by the product.

Which of the Following Will Be a Valid Defense in a Strict