In Cavel International,Inc.v.Madigan,Cavel,the only exporter of horsemeat to Europe for human consumption fought an Illinois state law prohibiting the slaughter of horses if the primary reason for slaughter was to produce horsemeat for sale.The court decided:
A) Illinois had a legitimate interest in prolonging the lives of certain animals and there was only a minimal effect on interstate or foreign commerce
B) Illinois could enforce the law intrastate but if the meat was exported the law interfered with foreign commerce and was therefore invalid
C) Illinois could enforce the law if it extended to all animals but they could not protect some and ignore others
D) Illinois could not enforce the law because Cavel was the sole company in the state exporting meat and the law targeted them unfairly
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: The power to impeach and remove is
Q43: Treaties:
A) may be entered into by the
Q45: One criticism of the USA Patriot Act
Q47: In Cipollone v.Liggett Group,Inc.,et al.,Cipollone sued based
Q48: The primary authorization of Constitutional powers is
Q49: In Pagan v.Fruchey and Village of Glendale,Pagan
Q50: When a state action is found to
Q52: The Equal Protection Clause is contained in
Q56: Protections under the Bill of Rights were
Q58: In the cases of Heart of Atlanta
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents