Why would lack of cooperation between criminal suspects be desirable for society as a whole?
A)The suspects are able to choose optimal outcomes for themselves by acting in their own self interest.
B)The prisoners' dilemma safeguards the criminals' constitutional rights.
C)More criminals will be convicted.
D)None of the above is correct.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Lack of cooperation between criminal suspects, often represented by the prisoner's dilemma, can lead to more criminals being convicted. This is because without cooperation, each suspect is more likely to provide evidence against the other. This can ultimately lead to stronger cases against all suspects involved, increasing the likelihood of prosecution and conviction. A and B are incorrect because lack of cooperation does not necessarily lead to optimal outcomes for suspects, nor does it inherently safeguard their constitutional rights.

Why Would Lack of Cooperation Between Criminal Suspects Be Desirable