One of the arguments against recording heritage assets as assets in the financial statements is that they typically generate negative net cash flows.SAC 4 argues in response to this that:
A) Economic benefits as defined in SAC 4 extend beyond the mere financial benefits that an entity chooses to extract from its assets.
B) These assets benefit the reporting entities, enabling them to meet their objectives of providing the needed services to beneficiaries.
C) Meeting the needs of beneficiaries in a broad sense provides an economic benefit to society as a whole that should be captured through financial measurement in the annual reports of the entity.
D) Heritage assets may in many cases not meet the definition of generating future economic benefits for the entity that controls them; however, in the cases where there is evidence of positive future cash flows these should be recorded as assets.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Unlike heritage assets,there has always been very
Q17: Agricultural produce is no longer re-measured to
Q18: AASB 101 requires heritage assets to be
Q19: In order to apply the contingent-valuation method
Q20: AASB 141 requires that a biological asset
Q22: AASB 141 excludes certain biological assets from
Q23: A contentious issue with heritage assets is
Q24: Jaenicke and Glazer (1992)suggest an alternative approach
Q25: Methods that have been used to provide
Q26: A broader issue raised by the measurement
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents