A broader issue raised by the measurement of heritage assets in the financial statements of government entities is the appropriateness of the AASB Framework Project for not-for-profit entities.Among other things,writers have argued that:
A) It is not clear that the social objectives of not-for-profit enterprises are compatible with the approach to accountability implied in the qualitative disclosures the Conceptual Framework Project gives rise to.
B) The heritage 'assets' held by not-for-profit entities should be de-accessioned and valued at cost if they are to fit within the definitions of assets in the Conceptual Framework. Where this is not feasible they fall outside the Conceptual Framework's objectives.
C) Accrual accounting concepts form the basis of the Conceptual Framework Project. These concepts are fundamentally based on the historical-cost approach to accounting and are therefore flawed in relation to heritage assets, which clearly should be valued using a market-based measure.
D) It is not clear that 'assets' held by not-for-profit entities should be defined in terms of their probability of generating future economic benefits.
E) All of the given answers.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: A recognition criterion for assets is that
Q28: Examples of biological assets include:
A) Trees in
Q29: A contentious issue with heritage assets is
Q30: In accordance with the requirements of the
Q31: Methods that have been used to provide
Q33: Measuring the value of heritage assets to
Q34: Contingent Valuation of Heritage will not be
Q35: Jaenicke and Glazer (1992)suggest an alternative approach
Q36: Biological assets may be difficult to classify
Q37: Roberts,Staunton and Hagen (1995)propose that biological assets
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents