In a debate in the Economics Department,Andrew makes the point: "Since I can save more by cutting back on expenditures on goods and services,everyone in Canada should be able to save more if all Canadians cut back on expenditures at the same time." The logic used by Andrew constitutes an example of the fallacy of composition because it mistakenly ignores the possibility that
A) the reduced total expenditure on goods and services may cause a recession.
B) the reduced total expenditure on goods and services may cause inflation.
C) the reduced total expenditure on goods and services may cause a recession and,consequently,a reduction in national saving.
D) the reduced total expenditure on goods and services may cause a relative price change.
E) the reduced total expenditure on goods and services may cause a productivity slowdown.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q119: A cost of aggregation is that
A) details
Q120: A government deficit is _ and government
Q121: When macroeconomists add together the purchases of
Q122: The strength of aggregation is that it
Q123: Which statement best illustrates the fallacy of
Q125: In a debate on the state of
Q126: To argue that,since one fan at a
Q127: Aggregation allows economists to _ at the
Q128: The fallacy of composition occurs when it
Q129: In a debate on the state of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents