Jason was conducting an evaluation of a restaurant waitress. He sat at the table with a list of things to observe in front of him, and the waitress noticed that he was assessing her every move. He noticed that she began acting more professionally around him, was friendlier, and gave him extra attention. Why would Jason have been better off using naturalistic observation for this assessment?
A) So that he could have more experimental control over his independent variable.
B) So that he would be sure to "catch" the waitress behaving unprofessionally.
C) So that he could have been sure to get enough data to use proper statistics.
D) So that his observations would not have changed the waitress's behaviours.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: The study of rare or unusual phenomena
Q7: If a researcher investigated the topic of
Q8: The more easily an image of an
Q9: An important danger of the heuristics and
Q10: The view of humans as cognitive processors
Q11: Correlational research designs are NOT appropriate for
Q13: Despite being unable to determine _ correlational
Q15: Sarah, a graduate student in psychology, just
Q16: Dr Fortner is discussing cognitive psychology with
Q17: A student researcher wishes to maximise the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents