If a researcher's initial findings that a particular relationship or effect exists are not reliably demonstrated by other independent researchers, how are these initial findings thought of in the discipline of psychology?
A)As a deliberate, unethical attempt to falsify one's data
B)As a one-time fluke in research
C)As a hoax or scam
D)As a real phenomenon that exists for some gifted people but not for everyone

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Initial findings that are not reliably demonstrated by other independent researchers are often considered a one-time fluke in research, rather than a deliberate attempt at falsification or a hoax. This could be due to a variety of factors such as methodological limitations, measurement error, or simply chance. However, it is important for researchers to replicate and validate findings to establish their validity within the field.

If a Researcher's Initial Findings That a Particular Relationship or Effect