Which of the following is an argument in favor of the National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA] cartel?
A)Those harmed by the NCAA policies are often more well off than those who benefit.
B)Student athletes are paid much more than their marginal value product.
C)Paying college athletes would destroy their amateur status and turn college athletics into a business.
D)NCAA policies result in a perfectly competitive market for student-athletes.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This argument suggests that paying college athletes would fundamentally change the nature of college athletics and detract from the spirit of amateurism. The NCAA has long held that college athletics should be about the love of the game and the experience of being a student-athlete, not about making money. By maintaining control over athlete compensation, the NCAA is able to preserve this notion of amateurism and prevent college sports from becoming too commercialized.

Which of the Following Is an Argument in Favor of the National