The following is a comment to the article "Are jobs obsolete?" by Douglas Rushkoff, Special to CNN September 7, 2011 (http://goo.gl/0aUXL):
Karaya: "We are at the point where the growth of human population becomes liability rather than asset. Higher sustainable standards of living can be maintained with much less population, and population growth actually can lead to humankind decline - just by depletion of environmental resources alone."
Karaya's comment implies that lower population would actually increase standards of living due to advances in technology. What do theories of growth have to say about the effect of population increase on economic prosperity? Is there a connection between a country's population, its technology, and its standard of living? What kind of information would you need to try to answer this question? How would an answer to this question look like?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q180: Economists generally believe that outward-oriented policies are
Q181: Technological innovations, by increasing productivity in manufacturing,
Q182: Suppose an economy uses only two inputs
Q183: Some civil society groups and activists propose
Q184: The real GDP per capita in an
Q185: Read the article "Are jobs obsolete?" by
Q186: Read the article "What Makes a Nation
Q187: The article "Are jobs obsolete?" by Douglas
Q188: The purpose of this problem is to
Q190: For background, read the article "Fruit pickers:
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents