The argument for judicial self-restraint is that federal judges are elected by the people and therefore should substitute their own views for the views of elected representatives.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument against judicial self-restraint is that federal judges are not elected by the people and therefore should not substitute their own views for the views of elected representatives. Judicial self-restraint suggests that judges should limit their power and defer to the decisions made by the other branches of government whenever possible.

The Argument for Judicial Self-Restraint Is That Federal Judges Are