Edgar Co.acquired 60% of Kindall Co.on January 1,2009.During 2009,Edgar made several sales of inventory to Kindall.The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000,respectively.Kindall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2009.Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2009 was $2,140,000.How would consolidated cost of goods sold have differed if the inventory transfers had been for the same amount and cost,but from Kindall to Edgar?
A) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been $2,140,000.
B) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been $2,175,000.
C) The effect on consolidated cost of goods sold cannot be predicted from the information provided.
D) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been reduced because of the noncontrolling interest in the subsidiary.
E) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been higher because of the noncontrolling interest in the subsidiary.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Gentry Inc.acquired 100% of Gaspard Farms on
Q4: X-Beams Inc.owned 70% of the voting common
Q5: Justings Co.owned 80% of Evana Corp.During 2009,Justings
Q6: Prince Corp.owned 80% of Kile Corp.'s common
Q7: REFERENCE: Ref.05_01
Pot Co.holds 90% of the common
Q9: Webb Co.acquired 100% of Rand Inc.on January
Q10: REFERENCE: Ref.05_01
Pot Co.holds 90% of the common
Q11: Clemente Co.owned all of the voting common
Q13: Bauerly Co.owned 70% of the voting common
Q37: What is the total of consolidated revenues?
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents