According to the court in Case 20.1,Maple Farms,Inc.v.City School District of Elmira,the defense of commercial impracticability will not excuse the performance of a contractual obligation when there is an increase in the seller's costs while the contract is in force
A) unless the increase in the seller's costs is substantial.
B) under any circumstances.
C) unless the increase in the seller's costs makes it impossible for the seller to perform without losing money.
D) unless the increase in the seller's costs was not foreseeable at the time the contract was formed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Primo Pools Company and Aquatic Recreation,Inc.,enter into
Q42: Sid and Tony enter a contract for
Q48: Food Packaging, Inc., agrees to sell 50,000
Q54: Vehicle Leasing Agency (VLA) and Wander Trucking
Q55: Summit Supply Company contracts for a sale
Q59: Relax Chair Company contracts to deliver 100
Q66: Garden Field Farms and Haute Gourmet Restaurant,Inc.,enter
Q70: Ramblin' Country Stables contracts to buy 1,000
Q76: Loni and Myra enter into a contract
Q77: Text Publishers, Inc., contracts for a sale
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents