In the legal definition of insanity,an accused person is NOT guilty of a crime if:
A) they have a DSM-IV diagnosis of mental illness.
B) the crime was so bizarre that no rational person could have committed it.
C) the accused was unable to comprehend the wrongfulness of the crime.
D) they belong in a mental institution as they are a danger to themselves or others.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The legal definition of insanity is based on the ability of the accused person to understand the wrongfulness of their actions at the time of the crime. A DSM-IV diagnosis of mental illness or being a danger to oneself or others may be used as evidence in the case, but it is not sufficient on its own to declare someone not guilty by reason of insanity. Similarly, the bizarre nature of the crime is not necessarily indicative of insanity. Therefore, the best choice is option C, which directly addresses the legal standard for insanity.

In the Legal Definition of Insanity,an Accused Person Is NOT