Consider the following abatement cost functions (TACO and MACO) for a firm using an old abatement (AO) technology:
TACO = 1000 + 0.25(AO)2
MACO = 0.5(AO),
where A is units of abatement undertaken by the firm, and the cost values are in thousands of dollars.
Further assume that the regulatory authority has set an abatement standard (AST) equal to 40 units for each firm and has proposed an emission charge implemented as a constant per unit tax (t) of $10 , where Total Tax = t(AST - Ai), and Ai is the existing abatement level.
a. If the state enacts the emission charge, find the associated cost savings to the firm, assuming the use of the old technology.
b. Now suppose that the firm is contemplating the use of a new abatement (AN) technology, which would generate the following cost functions:
TACN = 1000 + 0.125(AN)2
MACN = 0.25(AN)
Find the cost savings to the firm of using this new technology when faced with the emission charge.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q27: Real-world applications of deposit-refund systems include
A) programs
Q28: Assume that there are two firms, each
Q29: A pollution permit trading system
A) is not
Q30: In the single-polluter case, suppose a firm
Q31: The tax imposed on gasoline
A) is an
Q33: A Pigouvian subsidy
A) cannot achieve an efficient
Q34: In a deposit-refund system,
A) the refund component
Q35: When comparing a permit trading system to
Q36: The key components of a tradeable pollution
Q37: Per-unit pollution reduction subsidies
A) are implemented by
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents