The Los Angeles area has long been plagued by urban smog. Suppose that one of several ozone-reducing policy options is being evaluated by economists using benefit-cost analysis.
a. Since the policy will be implemented over time, economists assume that per resident benefits will accrue in increments of $500 (in real terms) at the end of each of the next three years. Find the present value of benefits (PVB) in nominal terms for each resident, assuming an annual inflation rate of 4% and a nominal annual discount rate of 9%.
b. Assume there are 2 million adult residents in the Los Angeles area to whom the per-resident PVB would accrue. Also assume that the estimated present value of costs (PVC) for this policy option is $2 billion.
(i). Is this option feasible? Why or why not? Show your supporting calculations.
(ii). If two other policy options have benefit-cost ratios of 1.23 and 1.05, can you determine which of the three is the most efficient? If so how? If not, why not?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Nominal Conversion:...
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q27: If, for a given policy option, PVNB
Q28: Deflating refers to
A) discounting a future value
Q29: Among the chief concerns about the use
Q30: In the expression for present value of
Q31: When benefit-cost analysis is used to facilitate
Q33: All of the following are true EXCEPT
A)
Q34: If (PVB/PVC) for a given policy option
Q35: Who was the first U.S. president to
Q36: The present value of benefits (PVB) is
Q37: In a benefit-cost analysis, the determination of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents