Steinberg and Scott 2003)argue that when teenagers are found guilty of a crime,it may be that their culpability is mitigated in comparison to that of typical adults.Which of these is not one of the reasons they argue teenagers are probably less culpable than adults?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Steinberg and Scott argue that teenagers are less culpable due to factors like diminished capacity, compelling circumstances, and uncharacteristic behavior, but fluctuating hormone levels are not cited as a reason for reduced culpability.

Steinberg and Scott 2003)argue That When Teenagers Are Found Guilty