According to the court in Case 14.1,Maple Farms,Inc.v.City School District of Elmira,the defense of commercial impracticability will not excuse the performance of a contractual obligation when there is an increase in the seller's costs while the contract is in force
A) unless the increase in the seller's costs is substantial.
B) under any circumstances.
C) unless the increase in the seller's costs makes it impossible for the seller to perform without losing money.
D) unless the increase in the seller's costs was not foreseeable at the time the contract was formed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Primo Pools Company and Aquatic Recreation,Inc.,enter into
Q34: A buyer who accepts nonconforming goods cannot
Q42: Citrus Groves contracts with four food companies
Q43: Pep Paints agrees to sell to Quality
Q45: Business Rental Corporation (BRC) and Cartage Trucking
Q48: Food Packaging, Inc., agrees to sell 50,000
Q55: Summit Supply Company contracts for a sale
Q59: Relax Chair Company contracts to deliver 100
Q70: Ramblin' Country Stables contracts to buy 1,000
Q71: Double D Ranch and Esau enter into
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents