Suppose that you want to determine the extent to which disability insurance (DI)prevents people's working who,in the absence of the program,would have worked.You do this by employing the cross-sectional regression analysis technique described in Chapter 3 and comparing the work histories of those receiving DI with those who are not receiving DI benefits,controlling for observable characteristics.
(a)Is this method likely to be sufficient? Explain.
(b)Bound (1989)studied the moral hazard of disability insurance by examining the employment histories of workers who applied for benefits but were denied them,and then comparing their employment with the employment records of individuals who received disability insurance benefits. (This is a quasi-experimental approach.)How does this approach compare with that described in part a?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q21: Suppose that someone gets a large cut
Q22: Replacing unemployment insurance with mandated worker self-insurance
Q23: The consumption-smoothing benefits of unemployment insurance are
Q24: How does unemployment insurance in the United
Q25: There is evidence of moral hazard if,after
Q27: Explain how the benefits and costs of
Q28: Which of the following is equivalent to
Q29: What is a potential advantage of a
Q30: Which of the following is consistent with
Q31: An increase in incidences of_ when workers'
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents