Suppose that there are two regions of a state,one where car theft is high and the other where car theft is very low.The state allows insurance companies to charge different premiums (which include insurance against vehicle theft)based in part on where the driver lives.Suppose the government is considering a policy change that would make it illegal to charge higher premiums to people in the areas of higher car theft.
(a)Assume that all drivers in the state are very risk averse when it comes to insurance against theft and that the insurance firms offer one rate to all drivers in that state.What kind of equilibrium will result? Who,if anyone,will pay a risk premium? Who will be better off,and who will be worse off?
(b)What might happen if the drivers in the areas of low car theft were not very risk averse?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q28: Under realistic conditions,optimal social insurance systems should:
A)
Q29: Administrative costs for private insurance average about
Q30: If the government mandates that everyone have
Q31: Maria is a rational consumer with no
Q32: A market equilibrium in which all types
Q34: If a person has imperfect or partial
Q35: Suppose you and your immediate relatives agree
Q36: The reasons for government involvement in social
Q37: If the government pays part of the
Q38: Suppose that you're selling life insurance,and a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents