In 1996,legal changes reduced the ability of noncitizens to benefit from cash welfare programs.Evidence on the resulting changes in charitable support by churches suggests that:
A) crowd-out is insignificant because churches in high-immigrant areas increased their charitable spending much more than churches in low-immigrant areas.
B) crowd-out is significant because churches in high-immigrant areas increased their charitable spending much more than churches in low-immigrant areas.
C) crowd-out is insignificant since there was no difference in the charitable spending of churches in high-immigrant areas and those in low-immigrant areas.
D) crowd-out is significant since there was no difference in the charitable spending of churches in high-immigrant areas and those in low-immigrant areas.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Which of the following is excludable,but nonrival
Q19: A painting by Monet is:
A) excludable but
Q20: Suppose a downtown business owner wants to
Q21: Which factor is likely to prevent private
Q22: Which activity is most consistent with altruism?
A)
Q24: Business improvement districts have tended to be
Q25: Which refers to the idea that even
Q26: In right-to-work states,the law allows people to
Q27: The three problems facing a government trying
Q28: Suppose a city manager finds that residents
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents