Is Sven's statement about linking funds with social welfare objectives correct?
A)Sven is partially correct in saying that Congress has no authority to link highway funds with social services,but any other funds may be linked to social services by executive order.
B)Sven is correct only if the state is making efforts to put social programs into effect and is not acting unreasonably in refusing to provide other needed services.
C)Sven is correct.
D)Sven is incorrect.
E)Sven is partially correct in saying that Congress has no authority to link highway funds with social services,but other funds may be linked to social services by an act of Congress.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)As with its power to tax,Congress can use its spending power to achieve social welfare objectives,and as an example,in the 1987 case of South Dakota v.Dole,the Supreme Court upheld a federal statute granting federal funds for state highways to only those states in which 21 is the legal drinking age.
B)As with its power to tax,Congress can use its spending power to achieve social welfare objectives,and as an example,in the 1987 case of South Dakota v.Dole,the Supreme Court upheld a federal statute granting federal funds for state highways to only those states in which 21 is the legal drinking age.
C)As with its power to tax,Congress can use its spending power to achieve social welfare objectives,and as an example,in the 1987 case of South Dakota v.Dole,the Supreme Court upheld a federal statute granting federal funds for state highways to only those states in which 21 is the legal drinking age.
D)As with its power to tax,Congress can use its spending power to achieve social welfare objectives,and as an example,in the 1987 case of South Dakota v.Dole,the Supreme Court upheld a federal statute granting federal funds for state highways to only those states in which 21 is the legal drinking age.
E)As with its power to tax,Congress can use its spending power to achieve social welfare objectives,and as an example,in the 1987 case of South Dakota v.Dole,the Supreme Court upheld a federal statute granting federal funds for state highways to only those states in which 21 is the legal drinking age.

Is Sven's Statement About Linking Funds with Social Welfare Objectives